有关于信息的英语翻译,急用着急啊!大家谁的英语好 帮忙下 谢谢啊!

有关于信息的英语翻译,急用着急啊!大家谁的英语好 帮忙下 谢谢啊!
2.2. Semi-cooperative coordination
A supply chain management system should be
aimed at coordinating the activities performed by
independent organizations in order to improve
the overall performance of the supply chain and
by taking into account the individual interests
and requirements of the supply chain members.
Coordination mechanisms should ensure a proper
balance between objectives and constraints of both
individual companies and the overall performance
of the supply chain. Most coordination models regard
logistics management as an auction in which
each entity tries to maximize its own profits (e.g.
[27,32,34]) or have a cooperative nature (e.g.
[3,16,17]).
Competitive approaches are aimed at optimizing
one mutually exclusive goal and involve competition
among stakeholders. Cooperative
mechanisms are often referred to as win–win
mechanism. It is often described as a decisionmaking
process of resolving a conflict involving
two or more parties over multiple, interdependent,
but non-mutually exclusive goals [16].
Within supply chains, suppliers and consumers
have their own selfish goals, but also the common
goal of creating an efficient and effective supply
chain. As a result current research on mechanism
design focuses on developing semi-cooperative
mechanisms, where agents strive to reach a fair
and reasonable agreement for all parties [17]. Such
approaches are aimed at optimizing supply chains
and which nevertheless maximizes single organizations
payoff.
Different semi-cooperative coordination mechanisms
are appropriate under different circumstances
[34]. It is often argued that mechanisms
need to be developed to accommodate the special
needs for a certain environment (e.g. [12,31]).
Sadeh et al. [27] distinguish between horizontal
and vertical coordination protocols. Horizontal
or lateral coordination protocols support interactions
between peer-levels agents, whereas vertical coordination protocols support interactions between
agents in different layers of the hierarchy.
Horizontal and vertical coordination might demand
different kinds of mechanisms having different
degrees of competitiveness. Cavalieri et al. [3]
introduce two kinds of agents: structural and functional
agents. The first kind of agents represents
actors in the supply chain, the second represents
function and processes, like manage information,
make decisions and so on.
Julka et al. [13,14] propose a unified framework
for modeling, monitoring and managing supply
chains. Their framework is made up of object
modeling of supply chain flows and agent-based
modeling of supply chain entities. Their framework
uses three classes of agents: (1) emulation;
(2) query and (3) project agents. Emulation agents
model the supply chain entities such as production
and sales departments. Query agents handle queries
from users and assists in supply chain analysis.
Project agents coordinate other agents to solve a
problem.

2.2 .半合作协调
的供应链管理系统应
旨在协调开展的活动
独立组织,以改善
总体业绩的供应链和
考虑到个人利益
和要求,供应链成员.
协调机制应确保适当
目标之间的平衡和制约因素都
个别公司和整体性能
供应链的一个环节.大多数协调模式方面
物流管理作为一个拍卖中
每个实体试图最大限度地发挥自己的利润（如：
[ 27,32,34 ] ） ,或有一个合作性质（如
[ 3,16,17 ] ） .
竞争力的做法,旨在优化
相互排斥的目标之一,并涉及竞争
利益相关者之间.合作社
机制,通常被称为双赢
机制.人们常常形容为决策
过程中涉及解决冲突
两个或两个以上缔约方多个,相互依存,
但不相互排斥的目标[ 16 ] .
在供应链,供应商和消费者
有自己的自私的目标,而且还共同
目标是创造一个有效率和有效供给
链.由于目前的机理研究
设计重点放在发展中国家半合作
机制,在代理人努力达成公平
合理的协议,为所有各方[ 17 ] .这种
办法的目的是优化供应链
并最大限度地提高单个组织尽管如此
回报.
不同半的合作协调机制
适合在不同的情况下
[ 34 ] .人们常常争辩说机制
需要制定,以适应特殊
需要一定的环境（例如[ 12,31 ] ） .
Sadeh等.[ 27 ]区分水平
和纵向协调议定书.卧式
或横向协调互动协议支持
与同行各级代理商,而纵向协调协议的支持之间的相互作用