作业帮英语问题（读文章回答）
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：拍题作业网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/04/29 17:45:33
英语问题（读文章回答）
Whenever anyone measures educational success, East Asian countries are always
top scorers. But in a recent league table, a
European country, Finland, was top of the class. South Korea
was still in second place, though. Britain was at number 6. What is the secret
of Finland and South Korea's success? Time to do some homework.
In Korea the school day is long - typically 7 or 8 hours, followed by hours
of private tutoring in the evenings. All this
hothousing leaves Korean students so tired, they sometimes fall
asleep in class next day. Worries about the effects of late night
cramming led the government to force cramming schools to close
by 10pm.
Finnish children spend the least time in class in the developed world, often
finishing just after lunch, with about one hour of homework a day.
Private tuition is uncommon. The British school day is quite
long in comparison, around 6 hours, and secondary school pupils do 2 or 3 hours
of self-study a night.
The Korean education system, like many in Asia, is intensely
competitive, with students even competing to get into the best cramming
schools, to help them get ahead. Finnish education is far less
cut-throat. Classes are all mixed ability, and
there are no league tables. British schools again occupy the middle
ground, with quite high levels of competition for places at university,
and schools and universities battling to come top of league
tables for everything from exam results to student
satisfaction.
Korea and Finland both do well, yet their education systems are so different.
So what lessons can Britain learn from these two swots?
Well, there are some similarities in Asia and Finland. In those countries,
teachers have high status in society, and education is very
highly valued. Those attitudes can't change quickly. But it can
be done. They might be the star pupil now, but until the 1970s,
Finland's educational system was poor. Their radically different
approach to schooling has taken them to the top in
just a generation.
问题according to the author ,the key to improving education is
A.The attitude B.new teaching approach
问;为何选A不选B,从文中最后一句话应该很明显看出选B吧?
Whenever anyone measures educational success, East Asian countries are always
top scorers. But in a recent league table, a
European country, Finland, was top of the class. South Korea
was still in second place, though. Britain was at number 6. What is the secret
of Finland and South Korea's success? Time to do some homework.
In Korea the school day is long - typically 7 or 8 hours, followed by hours
of private tutoring in the evenings. All this
hothousing leaves Korean students so tired, they sometimes fall
asleep in class next day. Worries about the effects of late night
cramming led the government to force cramming schools to close
by 10pm.
Finnish children spend the least time in class in the developed world, often
finishing just after lunch, with about one hour of homework a day.
Private tuition is uncommon. The British school day is quite
long in comparison, around 6 hours, and secondary school pupils do 2 or 3 hours
of self-study a night.
The Korean education system, like many in Asia, is intensely
competitive, with students even competing to get into the best cramming
schools, to help them get ahead. Finnish education is far less
cut-throat. Classes are all mixed ability, and
there are no league tables. British schools again occupy the middle
ground, with quite high levels of competition for places at university,
and schools and universities battling to come top of league
tables for everything from exam results to student
satisfaction.
Korea and Finland both do well, yet their education systems are so different.
So what lessons can Britain learn from these two swots?
Well, there are some similarities in Asia and Finland. In those countries,
teachers have high status in society, and education is very
highly valued. Those attitudes can't change quickly. But it can
be done. They might be the star pupil now, but until the 1970s,
Finland's educational system was poor. Their radically different
approach to schooling has taken them to the top in
just a generation.
问题according to the author ,the key to improving education is
A.The attitude B.new teaching approach
问;为何选A不选B,从文中最后一句话应该很明显看出选B吧?
我看了一下,主要问题是approach to schooling不等于new teaching approach.前者说的还是教育体系的建设问题,没有离开“态度”这个主题；后者则是指具体的教学法,文章中并未说这个是关键因素.
综合全文看,韩国和芬兰这也不同那也不同,但都成功了,唯一相同的就是态度,所以只能选态度了.
综合全文看,韩国和芬兰这也不同那也不同,但都成功了,唯一相同的就是态度,所以只能选态度了.