英语翻译歌德认为哈姆雷特之所以身负复仇重担而又踌躇,是由于他本身软弱的关系.我认为歌德仅仅看到了事物的表象,而没有把笔触

英语翻译
歌德认为哈姆雷特之所以身负复仇重担而又踌躇,是由于他本身软弱的关系.我认为歌德仅仅看到了事物的表象,而没有把笔触伸得更远.戏剧的情节告诉我们,哈姆雷特不是一个没有行动能力的人,他一怒之下一剑刺穿挂毯后面的窃听者波洛涅斯；他还在预谋甚至使用诡计的情况下,让设计谋害他的朝臣去送死,其行动是果断的甚至是富有智慧的.哈姆雷特不是一个理想说教者,不是一个时代精神的传声筒,之所以如此,源于他性格的丰富性、复杂性、矛盾性.
十九世纪后期德国批评家卡尔•魏尔德尔,在1875年发表断言:“哈姆雷特的踌躇原因根本不在丹麦王子的软弱性上,而是客观情势妨碍了实现复仇的计划.”②我认为魏尔德尔也仅仅看到了事物的一方面,我们承认,客观情势是哈姆雷特一再延宕的重要原因,但不完全是.
2 对于延宕,学界一般都视之为哈姆雷特的独特行为,而没有关注到延宕在剧中其实更为根本的是一种价值感现象；或者说,决定哈姆雷特延宕的是哈姆雷特的一种价值感.在剧中,哈姆雷特为父复仇的愿望可以说是强烈到了无以复加的地步,但在听了鬼魂的话之后,并没有直接实施复仇,而是成为一个“疯癫”的思考者
当哈姆雷特一出场,这个穿着黑衣服的、郁结着心事、满口“生存还是毁灭”的王子一下子切合了当时观众的期待视界.哈姆雷特为了复仇装疯卖傻,以及他所表现出来的愤世嫉俗,甚至是厌世情绪,无不和时代息息相关.特别是哈姆雷特在克劳狄斯祈祷时的踌躇,错过了复仇的良机,表现了浓厚的宗教色彩,也正是莎士比亚为人物预先确定的社会观念与道德规范,恰恰切合了当时人们的期待视界.
3 哈姆雷特的延宕与行动之间如果没有必然的联系,哈姆雷特的性格就必然是不统一的.从哈姆雷特的独白看,哈姆雷特尽管下定复仇的决心之时,也没忘记对生命价值的思考.他的内心深处还在不断地询问生命意义何在的问题
要彻底弄清哈姆雷特拖延复仇的原因,必须从主客观两方面加
以综合分析.造成哈姆雷特拖延复仇的并非是单纯的时机或方式,而是远为
复杂深刻的主客观因素：作为文艺复兴时期的新人,哈姆雷特从思想上与本
能上已经不能热衷于封建传统的复仇任务,而他所向往的“整好时代”和实
现人文主义理想的要求,又只能是一番空想.从主观上来说,哈姆雷特性格
稳重、谨慎、内向甚至有些多疑,但他并非是不善行动的人.他善于观察,
敢于思考社会问题,深知自己有责任改造这个“颠倒混乱的时代”,但又拿
不出具体可行的措施.他知道复仇意味着他不得不马上着手治理国家,但他
又感到准备不够,因此信心不足,至少在潜意识里他并不想过早处死国王,
于是,他的复仇计划便一拖再拖,最终导致自己与敌人同归于尽,酿成悲剧.
我要人工翻译 不要网页 说到做到.

Who are charged with Goethe that the reason Hamlet hesitated but the burden of revenge is due to the relationship between his own weakness. I think that Goethe only to see the appearance of things, but did not extend much further strokes. Dramatic plot tells us that Hamlet is not a person without capacity to act, under the sword pierced his anger behind the tapestry eavesdropping Polonius; he also planned to use tricks and even the case, so the design of his murder courtier to die, their action is decisive and even the rich wisdom. Hamlet is not a good preacher, not a mouthpiece of the spirit of the times, the reason that, from the richness of his character, complexity, and contradictions.
The late nineteenth century, the German critic Karl • Weill Bender, published in 1875 asserted: "The hesitation of Hamlet Prince of Denmark is simply not the reason for the weakness, but on the objective situation impeded the realization of plans for revenge." ② I think Weil Dell was only seen things on the one hand, we recognize that the objective situation is Hamlet important reasons for repeated delays, but not exactly.
2 for the delay, scholars are generally regarded as a unique act of Hamlet, but not concerned about the delays in the play in fact is a more fundamental sense of the value phenomenon; or that the decision is delayed Hamlet Hamlet a sense of the value. In the play, Hamlet, Revenge of the parent can be said that a strong desire to be added to the point, but after listening to the words of the ghost, and there is no direct implementation of revenge, but rather as a "madness" a thinker
When Hamlet came on wearing the black clothes, stagnation with your heart, speak a lot "or not to be" the prince at once to meet the expectations of the audience at that time horizon. Hamlet revenge play the fool, and he has shown cynical, and even world-weary mood, and the times are all closely related. In particular, Hamlet Claudius, the hesitated to pray, missed the opportunity of revenge, showing the biblical, it is also a pre-determined for the characters of Shakespeare's social values and ethics, just to meet people's expectations at the time horizon.
3 Hamlet without delay and action necessary link between, on the character of Hamlet is not necessarily uniform. Hamlet's soliloquy from view, although Hamlet's determination to make up the time of revenge, did not forget the value of life in China. His heart is still constantly asking the question what the meaning of life
To completely understand the reasons for Hamlet, Revenge, we must increase both subjective and objective
An integrated analysis. Delays caused by Hamlet's revenge is not the time or manner of a simple, but far
Complex and profound subjective and objective factors: a new Renaissance, in terms of ideology and the Hamlet
Can no longer keen on revenge mission feudal tradition, and his company for the "whole good times" and the real
Humanism is the ideal requirements and can only be some dream. From the subjective point of view, character Hamlet
Prudent, cautious, introverted and even some skeptical, but he is not a bad act. He is a good observation,
Dare to think of social problems, aware of his responsibility to transform this "era of reverse confusion," but to take
Not specific and feasible measures. He knew revenge means he had to start governing the country immediately, but he
They feel ready enough, therefore a lack of confidence, at least subconsciously he does not want premature execution of the king
So, his revenge would be further delayed, resulting in their own and the enemy die, causing the tragedy.