英语翻译I assume you meant to reply this e-mail to me,rather tha

英语翻译
I assume you meant to reply this e-mail to me,rather than
Stan.
Sonic Version:
I understand your concerns,but it would be better to be able
to introduce a product that is as good as or better than the brand (Clairsonic)
which is why am looking for an additional feature like the outer brush ring
that does not conflict with their patent.Please explain your drive mechanism
and how you avoid the Clairsonic patents?Can you adapt a very soft non-allergic
ring around the outer circumference rather than the stationary brush to keep the
skin lotions from spraying out when in use,which is what the stationary brush
ring does for Clairsonic.
In addition if you use a shaft drive sonic,you can also apply
the use of a one direction overrunning clutch to give one direction movement to
the outer ring brush that avoids the Clairsonic patent.
Low Cost/low Speed motor
version:
For the motor driven low speed units an eccentric (off center
brush gives a much better orbital action for skin cleaning.If the low speed
system uses a reciprocating drive the overrunning clutch can give single
indexing movement to an outer brush off the same drive shaft.This type of
system does not decrease reliability as it was use in postage mailing systems
that required 10 million cycle life back in the
1970's.
I really want to see some operating specifications for your
products as well as an explanations of how your sonic model avoids infringement
of Clairsonic

我以为你想回复这封邮件给我,而不是斯坦.声波版：我理解你的担忧,但它会更好,能够引进一个一样好或更好的品牌产品（clairsonic）这就是为什么正在寻找像外刷环,不与他们的专利冲突的一个额外的功能.请解释你的驱动机制和如何避免克莱尔声波的专利吗?你能适应非常柔软的非过敏性的环外圆周上而不是固定的电刷保持皮肤的乳液喷出时使用,这是什么固定刷环是克莱尔声.此外,如果你使用一个轴驱动的声波,你也可以一一个方向超越离合器,给一个方向移动到外环刷,避免了克莱尔声波专利应用.低成本/低转速的版本：用于电机驱动的低速单位偏心（偏离中心的刷提供了一个更好的轨道作用皮肤清洗.如果低速系统采用往复运动的驱动超越离合器可以给单个分度运动外刷掉相同的驱动轴.这种类型的系统不降低可靠性是使用邮寄系统,需要10000000个周期的生活真的早在1970我想看到一些操作规范你的产品以及解释如何你的声学模型避免了克莱尔声波侵权