作业帮关于中国教育体制的英文文章!着重要写中国教育体制的弊端是什么,好处也多少写点,呵呵,
来源：学生作业帮 编辑：拍题作业网作业帮 分类：英语作业 时间：2024/04/28 12:44:24
关于中国教育体制的英文文章!着重要写中国教育体制的弊端是什么,好处也多少写点,呵呵,
二十多年前,邓小平提出了科学技术的现代化是四个现代化的关键.每当邓小平提到经济体制改革时,他总是要特别强调教育体制和科技体制的改革.现在,二十多年过去了,实践证明了邓小平的先见之明.在全球化和知识经济的今天,没有比教育和科技更重要了,而发展科技的关键就是人才.说道人才就不得不提到教育.
自从改革开放的20多年来中国的市场经济取得的巨大成功是有目共睹的,也是中国的的经济有了很大的增长.但是教育体制就没有那么幸运了.并且现在教育问题已经成了制约中国科技,经济发展的一个瓶颈.20多年来虽然做过很多尝试,也不乏凌云壮志的人物,但是并没有什么根本上的改变.与西方发达国家的差距不但没有缩小还在继续扩大.也没有任何人敢夸口说中国的教育体制的改革是成功的.我认为中国教育体制的问题有三点.
首先中国的教育体制缺乏自主性.中国的经济改革之所以能成功就与变计划经济为市场经济,市场多元化了之后经济改革才有了真正的突破.而直到现在中国的教育体系还掌握在政府手中,所有的教育方法制度都是由政府制定的.这就意味着想在的教育体制没有任何自主性可言,就更不要指望有能有什么更高效的教育方法.欧美大学发展的根基就是其自主性.
像哈佛,耶鲁,普林斯顿等现在的世界顶尖大学在建立之初不过也就是几个普普通通的学院.当时也没有任何人希望他们能走到现在的这一步.但他们共同的特点就是自主性.大学教授的终身制也是为了保持教授的自主性.这样他们既不用担心因为自己的学术观点被解雇或受到外界其他的影响.而中国大学中有天壤之别,教授们要定期学论文完成指定的业绩,还有末位淘汰制.着这样的环境下谁能有什么突破性的想法.
其次就是教学内容的设置现在中学的主科有语文,数学,英语,物理,化学等每科的学业都很繁重.人类从远古时代就有了分工也就是说不是每个人以后的工作中能用到所有的内容,一个作家绝不可能每天要面对一堆一元二次方程.一个科学家也不可能整天跟古诗文打交道.而且每个人擅长的学科也不一样,有的擅长语文有的擅长理科.而现在的教育体制并不注重培养一个人的长处反而只注重提高一个人的短处,妄图能把每个人都培养成全才.这种人前无古人后也不会有来者.这样的结果就是会把每个人变成长处不长短处不短的平庸的人.这种所谓的“全才”必定会在精通某一方面的“专才”面前败下阵来.
最后就是不注重培养学生的创造力,甚至是故意去抹杀他.老师对学生的的评价只有分数从语文的教学上也能看出来.几乎所有的题都有一个标准的套路,一旦学生在答题时没有按照这个规则答结果就是没分.写作文的要求也是要达到所谓的“思想健康”否则就是你写的再好也顶多是一个及格成绩.
近期教育体制有了一些改革想什么高中的学分制啊什么的.但是学生的状况几乎没有发生任何变化.我认为只要中国的应试教育不改了一切教育上的改革都是空谈.
教育体制的改革再也不能回避了,政府必须痛下决心,彻底改革旧制.人才竞争场上的失败永远弥补不了其他方面的伟大成功.
译文：
More than 20 years ago, Deng Xiaoping put forward the modernization of science and technology is
the key to the four modernizations. When Deng Xiaoping's economic reform that, he was always a
special emphasis on the education system and scientific and technological system reform. Now, more
than 20 years have passed, and Practice has proved that Deng Xiaoping's foresight that. In the
context of globalization and knowledge-based economy of today, nothing is more important education
and technology, and the development of science and technology is the key personnel. Said people
have to mention education.
Since the reform and opening up over the past 20 years China's market economy achieved tremendous
success is obvious to all, China is also a great economic growth. But the education system not so
lucky. And now education has become China's scientific and technical constraints, the economic
development of a bottleneck. Although more than 20 years done a lot of attempts, also no lack of
Lingyun aspiration of the people, but there is no fundamental change. And the Western developed
countries has not only failed to narrow the gap continues to expand. And no one dares boasted that
China's education system reform is a success. I think the issue of China's education system has
three.
First, China's lack of autonomy of the education system. China's economic reform and has been able
to successfully change the planned economy to market economy, market diversification of the
economic reform after only a real breakthrough. But until now China's education system also is in
the hands of the government, all the way education system are formulated by the Government. This
means that the education system would have no autonomy at all, they do not expect to have any more
efficient teaching methods. European and American universities is the foundation for the
development of its autonomy.
Like Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and so now the world's top universities in the beginning, however,
is the establishment of several ordinary colleges. At that time, there is no hope now they can come
to this step. But their common characteristic is autonomy. University professor of life tenure is
also in order to maintain the autonomy of the professor. So they do not use because they worry
about the academic point of view was dismissed by outsiders or other effects. The Chinese are poles
apart from the University, professors regularly papers to complete the assigned school performance,
bottom-out system. In such circumstances who can have any breakthrough ideas.
Second is the teaching of secondary schools now set up the main Branch Language, Mathematics,
English, physics, chemistry, and other studies for each subject are heavy. Mankind from ancient
times there will be a division of labor that is to say not everyone can be used in future work to
all content, a writer can never be a day to face a pile of one yuan quadratic equation. Scientists
can not be a full day dealing with ancient poetry text. But everyone is not as good at the subject,
some good at languages some good at science. Now the education system does not pay attention to
cultivating one's strengths instead of only pay attention to improving one's weaknesses in a vain
attempt to have each person can only train Chengquan.After such a person would not have a parallel
in history to those. This is the result of each person will not become strengths of the length of
the lot of ordinary people. The so-called "Quancai" will be proficient in a particular aspect of
"professionals" before it lost.
Finally is the training of students do not pay attention to the creativity, or even deliberately to
deny him. Teacher to student evaluation scores from the only language teaching can be seen. Almost
all of that has a standard routine, once the answer when students did not follow this rule: the
result is not. Writing text of the requirements is to achieve the so-called "thinking of health,"
it is that you have at most, no matter how good the writing is a pass.
With the recent reform the education system to what high school ah what the credit system. However,
the situation of almost no students of any changes. I think that as long as China's exam-oriented
education has not changed all education reforms are empty.
The education system reform can no longer be avoided, the pain must be determined, thorough reform
of the old system. The failure of market competition for talent can never make up for other areas of great success.
自从改革开放的20多年来中国的市场经济取得的巨大成功是有目共睹的,也是中国的的经济有了很大的增长.但是教育体制就没有那么幸运了.并且现在教育问题已经成了制约中国科技,经济发展的一个瓶颈.20多年来虽然做过很多尝试,也不乏凌云壮志的人物,但是并没有什么根本上的改变.与西方发达国家的差距不但没有缩小还在继续扩大.也没有任何人敢夸口说中国的教育体制的改革是成功的.我认为中国教育体制的问题有三点.
首先中国的教育体制缺乏自主性.中国的经济改革之所以能成功就与变计划经济为市场经济,市场多元化了之后经济改革才有了真正的突破.而直到现在中国的教育体系还掌握在政府手中,所有的教育方法制度都是由政府制定的.这就意味着想在的教育体制没有任何自主性可言,就更不要指望有能有什么更高效的教育方法.欧美大学发展的根基就是其自主性.
像哈佛,耶鲁,普林斯顿等现在的世界顶尖大学在建立之初不过也就是几个普普通通的学院.当时也没有任何人希望他们能走到现在的这一步.但他们共同的特点就是自主性.大学教授的终身制也是为了保持教授的自主性.这样他们既不用担心因为自己的学术观点被解雇或受到外界其他的影响.而中国大学中有天壤之别,教授们要定期学论文完成指定的业绩,还有末位淘汰制.着这样的环境下谁能有什么突破性的想法.
其次就是教学内容的设置现在中学的主科有语文,数学,英语,物理,化学等每科的学业都很繁重.人类从远古时代就有了分工也就是说不是每个人以后的工作中能用到所有的内容,一个作家绝不可能每天要面对一堆一元二次方程.一个科学家也不可能整天跟古诗文打交道.而且每个人擅长的学科也不一样,有的擅长语文有的擅长理科.而现在的教育体制并不注重培养一个人的长处反而只注重提高一个人的短处,妄图能把每个人都培养成全才.这种人前无古人后也不会有来者.这样的结果就是会把每个人变成长处不长短处不短的平庸的人.这种所谓的“全才”必定会在精通某一方面的“专才”面前败下阵来.
最后就是不注重培养学生的创造力,甚至是故意去抹杀他.老师对学生的的评价只有分数从语文的教学上也能看出来.几乎所有的题都有一个标准的套路,一旦学生在答题时没有按照这个规则答结果就是没分.写作文的要求也是要达到所谓的“思想健康”否则就是你写的再好也顶多是一个及格成绩.
近期教育体制有了一些改革想什么高中的学分制啊什么的.但是学生的状况几乎没有发生任何变化.我认为只要中国的应试教育不改了一切教育上的改革都是空谈.
教育体制的改革再也不能回避了,政府必须痛下决心,彻底改革旧制.人才竞争场上的失败永远弥补不了其他方面的伟大成功.
译文：
More than 20 years ago, Deng Xiaoping put forward the modernization of science and technology is
the key to the four modernizations. When Deng Xiaoping's economic reform that, he was always a
special emphasis on the education system and scientific and technological system reform. Now, more
than 20 years have passed, and Practice has proved that Deng Xiaoping's foresight that. In the
context of globalization and knowledge-based economy of today, nothing is more important education
and technology, and the development of science and technology is the key personnel. Said people
have to mention education.
Since the reform and opening up over the past 20 years China's market economy achieved tremendous
success is obvious to all, China is also a great economic growth. But the education system not so
lucky. And now education has become China's scientific and technical constraints, the economic
development of a bottleneck. Although more than 20 years done a lot of attempts, also no lack of
Lingyun aspiration of the people, but there is no fundamental change. And the Western developed
countries has not only failed to narrow the gap continues to expand. And no one dares boasted that
China's education system reform is a success. I think the issue of China's education system has
three.
First, China's lack of autonomy of the education system. China's economic reform and has been able
to successfully change the planned economy to market economy, market diversification of the
economic reform after only a real breakthrough. But until now China's education system also is in
the hands of the government, all the way education system are formulated by the Government. This
means that the education system would have no autonomy at all, they do not expect to have any more
efficient teaching methods. European and American universities is the foundation for the
development of its autonomy.
Like Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and so now the world's top universities in the beginning, however,
is the establishment of several ordinary colleges. At that time, there is no hope now they can come
to this step. But their common characteristic is autonomy. University professor of life tenure is
also in order to maintain the autonomy of the professor. So they do not use because they worry
about the academic point of view was dismissed by outsiders or other effects. The Chinese are poles
apart from the University, professors regularly papers to complete the assigned school performance,
bottom-out system. In such circumstances who can have any breakthrough ideas.
Second is the teaching of secondary schools now set up the main Branch Language, Mathematics,
English, physics, chemistry, and other studies for each subject are heavy. Mankind from ancient
times there will be a division of labor that is to say not everyone can be used in future work to
all content, a writer can never be a day to face a pile of one yuan quadratic equation. Scientists
can not be a full day dealing with ancient poetry text. But everyone is not as good at the subject,
some good at languages some good at science. Now the education system does not pay attention to
cultivating one's strengths instead of only pay attention to improving one's weaknesses in a vain
attempt to have each person can only train Chengquan.After such a person would not have a parallel
in history to those. This is the result of each person will not become strengths of the length of
the lot of ordinary people. The so-called "Quancai" will be proficient in a particular aspect of
"professionals" before it lost.
Finally is the training of students do not pay attention to the creativity, or even deliberately to
deny him. Teacher to student evaluation scores from the only language teaching can be seen. Almost
all of that has a standard routine, once the answer when students did not follow this rule: the
result is not. Writing text of the requirements is to achieve the so-called "thinking of health,"
it is that you have at most, no matter how good the writing is a pass.
With the recent reform the education system to what high school ah what the credit system. However,
the situation of almost no students of any changes. I think that as long as China's exam-oriented
education has not changed all education reforms are empty.
The education system reform can no longer be avoided, the pain must be determined, thorough reform
of the old system. The failure of market competition for talent can never make up for other areas of great success.