英语翻译一 人道主义干涉合法论劳特派特认为,如果一个国家犯有对本国人民施行残暴或迫害的罪行,以至否定他们的基本人权并且震

英语翻译
一 人道主义干涉合法论
劳特派特认为,如果一个国家犯有对本国人民施行残暴或迫害的罪行,以至否定他们的基本人权并且震骇人类的良知,那么,为人道而进行的干涉是法律所允许的.可见,劳特派特认为“人道主义干涉”是合法的.但同时他也指出了《联合国宪章》对传统的“人道主义干涉”的否定,并对个别国家滥用干涉的行为表示质疑.但他并未指出人道主义干涉的合法性依据.支持合法论的还有美国国际法教授、美洲国家人权法院法官托马斯伯根索尔,吴尔玺,劳伦斯,穆尔和斯托厄尔等,可以认为,支持人道主义干涉原则的主要是英美学者.
但是略读其理论就可以发现,支持这一理论的学派却有其自相矛盾的地方,那就是一方面他们主张人道主义干涉合法性,但同时在另一方面,他们又找不出这种合法性的合法依据.因为《联合国宪章》明确规定了“禁止使用武力和干涉他国内政” 的原则.因此支持合法性的学者们试图从另一方面,即在联合国宪章的范围内,认为人道主义干涉应由联合国组织实施,甚至指出了不干涉他国内政的原则,而这也恰恰构成了与其基本的合法性观点相矛盾的地方.

一Humanitarian intervention legal theory
Always the piper think,if a country of their own people convicted of brutal or persecution crimes,to deny their basic human rights and shock human conscience,so,for humanitarian intervention is the laws permit.Visible,always the piper think "humanitarian intervention" is legal.But he also pointed out that the United Nations charter of traditional "humanitarian intervention" negative,and the individual countries abuse interference behavior questioned.But he did not indicate the legality of humanitarian intervention basis.Supports legal theory of international law professors,America and the United States national human rights court judge Thomas bergen sol,WuErXi,Lawrence,Moore and stowe el etc,can think supporting the humanitarian intervention principles are mainly the British and American scholar.
But skimming the theory can be found,support the theory of school,he has his socratecan die in the handof Athens,that is hand they advocate humanitarian intervention legitimacy,but at the same time,on the other hand,and they can't find out the legitimacy of the legal basis.Because the United Nations charter clearly specified "banned the use of force and interfere in the internal affairs of" principle.Therefore the legitimacy of academics try to support from on the other hand,namely in the UN charter,within the scope of the think humanitarian intervention should by the United Nations organization and implementation,and even points out not interfere in the internal affairs of principles,and this is precisely constitute the legalit