作业帮 > 综合 > 作业

一道托福阅读题求解Paragraph 5:Modern architectural forms generally ha

来源:学生作业帮 编辑:拍题作业网作业帮 分类:综合作业 时间:2024/05/22 21:30:07
一道托福阅读题求解
Paragraph 5:Modern architectural forms generally have three separate components comparable to elements of the human body; a supporting skeleton or frame,an outer skin enclosing the interior spaces,equipment,similar to the body’s vital organs and systems.The equipment includes plumbing,electrical wiring,hot water,and air-conditioning.Of course in early architecture—such as igloos and adobe structures—there was no such equipment,and the skeleton and skin were often one.
9.Which of the following correctly characterizes the relationship between the human body and architecture that is described in paragraph5?
○Complex equipment inside buildings is the one element in modern architecture that resembles a component of the human body.
○The components in early buildings were similar to three particular elements of the human body.
○Modern buildings have components that are as likely to change as the human body is.
○In general,modern buildings more closely resemble the human body than earlier buildings do.
我觉得A也可以在文中找到依据equipment,similar to the body’s vital organs and systems,人体内器官一样重要的设施,那么把这些equipment视为人体的一个组成成分,那么A也对啊.
题目强调的是 人类身体和建筑的关联 ,也就是说,答案应该是强调两者(the human body and architecture)的联系.
A选项的确可以在文中找到答案,但是它具体化了,强调的不是关系,而是one element, a component.
所以,就本题,D项符合题意.
再问: 但我觉得D答案更加没有强调the human body and architecture的关系,而是将modern building和earlierbuilding在human body的相似度上做了比较,我当时在A和D中犹豫了一下,认为A中至少是在谈the human body and architecture的联系,虽然不全面但至少扣题了啊A选项是correctly characterize。。。。
再答:   首先,仔细读一下选项A,其中“the one element ”很诡异,给人感觉强调“only one element”--这就与文意不符了,原文说modern architecture由三个元素构成;因为如果泛指一个元素,只要说“one element”,语法上说不需要“the” 。   其次,再看原文段落主题:是比较modern architecture和 early architecture, 而且从最后一句话看得出:modern architecture与early architecture相比,构造上更接近人体结构(因为包含了三部分可以分别与人体三个组成部分相对应)--而选项D贴切的体现了这一点,并且D比A更全面,D除了有architecture与human body的类比,还包括了对比(modern architecture与early architecture)。   最后,从技巧上来说,D很概括,高度抽象,rephrase了原文,但又最准确全面地概括了段意,并且用了"in general" "more closely"这种限定语,话说得滴水不漏,很严密--这正是解的常见特征!而反观选项A,只有类比没有对比,不够全面。而且very straightforward, kind of superficial,只描述了一点很显而易见的观点,乍一看说的对。如果真的事两个选项说的观点内容都对,那我们也得挑说得更全面用语更准确的那个. 希望能够帮助到你。