作业帮 > 英语 > 作业

这句我看了好久不明白,我刚刚提问这个把分用掉了.这回没分了.请谅解

来源:学生作业帮 编辑:拍题作业网作业帮 分类:英语作业 时间:2024/04/28 03:04:13
这句我看了好久不明白,我刚刚提问这个把分用掉了.这回没分了.请谅解
the"codes"reffred to in CC&Rs do not have to be set out in the recorded document;they can be detaile codes or pattern books separate from those documents provided that their enforcement mechanisms are spellde out in the recorded documents.
你打的错误太多了,我很难判断哦,重新改一下
再问: CC&Rs are always recorded in order to apply to subsequent property owners,The"codes"referred to in CC&Rs do not have to be set out in the recorded document;they can be detailed codes or pattern books separate from those documents provided that their enforcement mechanisms are spelled out in the recorded documents. CC&Rs是 codes covenants and restrictions
再答: the"codes"referred to in CC&Rs 是主语,意思是:CC&R(规范、契约及限制条件)这个术语中的codes(规范),注:codes还有准则的意思 do not have to be set out in the recorded document 不需要都是用书面文件所记录下来的 providing that ...是条件状语从句,“前提如果是” 这个句子的意思是: CC&R中的Codes不一定非得是书面文件,前提如果某些规定的厉行机制已有书面的文件说明,那么Codes可以是不成文的准则或甚至是图样也行。
再问: 原来providing that 是前提如果是的意思。 detailed codes 我还一直以为是详细说明的规范 非常感谢~~很明白了~~