英语翻译The downside of depending only on compliance verificatio

英语翻译
The downside of depending only on compliance verification methods for safety is that you are not designing the optimal safety into the system.Also,compliance with standards and regulations is the minimal effort,not always sufficient to prevent an accident.Many engineers complain about using OSHA compliance standards such as 29 CFR 1910 because it is a huge compliance of seemingly unrelated requirements.Many times an engineer is left wondering why something has to be 44 in.wide to safe.What is much more useful is to introduce the concept of system safety analysis-analyzing the system to find the hazards—not just relying on compliance checklists.System safety in a manufacturing plant is a great way to optimize safety; the engineer is actually thinking about how the system could be made safer,not just blindly following regulations.
Even though the manufacturing industry is principally compliance-based,it is changing.System safety engineering techniques and management styles are now being incorporated as well.For example,OSHA ’s Voluntary Protection Program(VPP)“has demonstrated that VPP plants have more than 40 percent fewer lost workday injuries than would be expected for plants in the same standard industrial classification”.The four major components off VPP are management commitment and employee participation,workplace analysis,hazard awareness and control,and training.The most frequently used safety analyses are safety checklists,compliance analysis,and process hazard analysis(in industries that handle hazardous chemicals).
Also,with the advent of the 1992 OSHA Process Safety standard,companies are encouraged to use more sophisticated techniques for making systems safe.The Process Safety standard is most common in the chemical industry,but it is applicable to anyone who uses hazardous materials.
It is also beneficial to use system safety tools from other industries.One such tool is hazard analysis,which is used to help identify and control hazard in a system.The technique,though invented in the military and aerospace industries,can easily be applied to the manufacturing world.In fact,facility hazard analysis is a specific use of hazard analysis in facility acquisition.The U.S.Navy has used it for many years in all of their facility constructions and renovations.The Navy has used it for such things as construction or modification of fuel depots,pier and dry dock upgrades,and for entire submarine bases.
Operations and support hazard analysis is a safety method that also has strong potential in manufacturing.The safety tool is applicable to any situation where human operators are an integral part of the process.For example,any plant that moves large amounts of material during the manufacturing process could benefit from using this tool.The analysis identifies the hazards at the critical points in the process where human error could have disastrous effects.

这么多!
坏处依靠,只有严格遵守核查方法的安全是你没有设计最优的安全进入系统.同时,遵守标准和规章,是最低限度的努力,并不总是有足够的,以防止意外发生.很多工程师抱怨使用遵守职业安全与卫生署的标准,如29病死率为10年,因为它是一个庞大的遵守看似无关的要求.很多次,一个工程师是左的东西为什么要四四英寸广泛的安全.什么是更为有用的是引进的概念,系统安全分析分析系统找到的危险,不只是依靠对遵守情况检查.系统的安全生产厂是一个伟大的方式来优化安全;工程师,其实是思考如何该系统可以更安全,而不只是盲目下列规定.
即使制造业,主要是遵守为基础的,它正在改变.系统安全工程技术和管理作风,现正被纳入.举例来说,职业安全与卫生署奇摩自愿保护计划（ vpp ） “已经证明,vpp植物有40 ％以上,少损失工作日的伤害会比预期的植物在同一标准产业分类” .四个主要组成部分小康vpp是管理层的承诺和雇员的参与,工作分析,危险性的认识和控制,和培训.最常用的安全分析,安全检查清单,遵守分析,过程危险性分析（在产业,处理危险化学品） .
此外,与来临,1992年职业安全与卫生署的过程中的安全标准,公司鼓励使用更先进的技术,使系统的安全.过程中的安全标准是最常见的在化学工业,但它是适用于任何人使用有害材料.
它也有利于使用的系统安全工具,从其他行业.一个这样的工具是危害分析,这是用来帮助识别和控制风险的一种制度.技术,虽然发明了在军事和航空航天工业,可以轻易地被应用到制造业的世界.事实上,在设施,危害分析是一种特定的使用危险性分析在基金收购.美海军用它多年,在他们所有的设施建设和翻修.海军已用它为这些事情,作为建设或改造的燃料库,码头和干船坞升级,为整个潜艇基地.
运营和支持危害分析是一个安全的方法,也具有很强的潜力,在制造业.安全工具是适用于任何情况下,人类的经营者是不可分割的一部分的过程.举例来说,任何植物的举动,大量的材料在制造过程中可受益于使用这个工具.分析确定了危险的临界点,在这个过程中如果人为错误可能造成灾难性的影响.